Abstract

During the Eastern Crisis of the 1870s, the British political elites followed with particular attention the Panslavic ideas expressed in Russia and often perceived them as a threat of the Russian Empire’s expansion into the Balkan Peninsula. However, at the very beginning of the Eastern Crisis, the British Parliament’s attitude to the Russian Panslavism was neutral or even positive and it had a considerable impact on British-Russian relations. Britain’s perception of Russian Panslavism during this short but signifi cant period has not been researched yet. This article uses the materials of parliamentary debates to trace the transformation of images of Russian Panslavism in the British political discourse in 1876 and to analyze the mechanisms of their construction. The author identifi es three models of interpretation of Russia’s “Slavic interests”, first, as “Slavic sympathies” of the Russian population, second, as Russia’s “territorial ambitions”, and third, as “Russian intrigues”, which allegedly instigated Slav uprisings against the Ottoman Empire. In the summer of 1876, the interpretation of Panslavism as sincere sympathies of Russian society for its Slavic brothers received the greatest weight in the British political discourse. This interpretation contributed to the formation of a more positive image of Russia and even a temporary change in the pro-Turkish policy of the British government. However, by the late 1876, British politicians increasingly began to suspect the Russian government of “subversive Panslavism”. The formation of images of Russian Panslavism in the political discourse of Great Britain was infl uenced not only the traditional patterns of British foreign policy, but also by the internal political struggle that escalated during the “Bulgarian agitation”. Panslavism was also interpreted ambiguously due to the lack of information, so politicians oft en based their judgments on stereotypes about Russia, the Ottoman Empire and the Balkan peoples. Finally, parliamentarians’ views were also aff ected by a rethinking of their own British identity. British politicians revisited issues of relevance to Britain’s own attitudes to the sovereignty of empires, the uprisings of colonized peoples, moral responsibility and Britain’s international mission

References

Beasley E. Making Races // Victorian Review. 2014. Vol. 40. N 1. P. 48–52.

Çiçek N. The Turkish Response to Bulgarian Horrors: A Study in English Turcophobia // Middle Eastern Studies. 2006. Vol. 42. N 1. P. 87–102.

Dixon S. Allegiance and Betrayal: British Residents in Russia during the Crimean War // Th e Slavonic and East European Review. 2016. Vol. 94. N 3. P. 431–467.

D’yakov V.A. Slavyanskiy vopros v obshchestvennoy zhizni dorevolyutsionnoy Rossii [Slavic Question in the Public Life of Pre-Revolutionary Russia]. Moscow: Nauka, 1993. 207 p.

Gella T.N. Obraz Rossii v politicheskoy ritorike britanskikh parlamentariyev v period Vostochnogo krizisa 70-kh godov XIX veka [Th e Image of Russia in the Political Rhetoric of British Parliamentarians during the Eastern Crisis of the 1870s] // “Svoi” i “Drugiye”: vzaimodeystviye i vospriyatiye kul’tur Zapada i Rossii [“One’s Own” and “Others”: Interaction and Perception of Cultures of the West and Russia] / Ed. By T.L. Labutina. Saint Petersburg: Aleteia, 2020. P. 256–274.

Gleason J.H. Genesis of Russophobia in Great Britain: A Study of the Interaction of Policy and Opinion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1950. 314 p.

Goldsworthy V. Inventing Ruritania: The Imperialism of the Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998. 254 p.

Grigor’yeva A.A. Panslavizm: ideologiya i politika (40-ye gody XIX — nachalo XX veka) [Panslavism: Ideology and Politics (1840s — Early 20th Century)]. Irkutsk: Asprint, 2013. 200 p.

Heraclides A., Dialla A. Humanitarian Intervention in the Long Nineteenth Century: Setting the Precedent. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2015. 253 p.

Hillis F. Th e “Franco-Russian Marseillaise”: International Exchange and the Making of Antiliberal Politics in Fin de Siècle France // Th e Journal of Modern History. 2017. Vol. 89. N 1. P. 39–78.

Istoriya Balkan. Sud’bonosnoye dvadtsatiletiye (1856–1878 gg.) [History of the Balkans. Fateful Twenty Years (1856–1878)] / Ed. by V.N. Vinogradov. Moscow: URSS KRASAND, 2013. 331 p.

MacKenzie D. Panslavism in Practice: Cherniaev in Serbia (1876) // The Journal of Modern History. 1964. Vol. 36. N 3. P. 279–297.

Neumann I.B. Ispol’zovaniye “Drugogo”: obrazy Vostoka v formirovanii yevropeyskikh identichnostey [Uses of the “Other”. Th e East in European Identity Formation]. Moscow: Novoye izdatel’stvo, 2004. 335 p.

Nikitin S.A. Slavyanskiye komitety v Rossii v 1858–1876 godakh [Slavic Committees in Russia in 1858–1876]. M.: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1960. 361 p.

Pavlenko O.V. Panslavizm i yego modeli [Panslavism and Its Models] // Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya. 2016. N 5. P. 3–15.

Prokudin B.A. Ideya slavyanskogo yedinstva v politicheskoy mysli Rossii XIX veka: genezis, osnovnyye napravleniya i etapy razvitiya: diss. … kanidata politicheskikh nauk [Idea of Slavic Unity in the Political T ought of Russia in the 19th Century: Genesis, Main Trends and Development Stages: PhD Candidate Diss. in Political Sciences]. Moscow: MGU, 2007. 180 p.

Rokina G.R. Iz istorii traktovki termina “panslavizm” v rabotakh otechestvennykh i zarubezhnykh avtorov XIX veka [From the History of the Interpretation of the Term “Panslavism” in the Works of Russian and Foreign Authors of the 19th Century] // “Zapad–Vostok”. Nauchno-prakticheskiy yezhegodnik. 2010. N 3. P. 92–102.

Seton-Watson R.W. Disraeli, Gladstone, and the Eastern Question: A Study in Diplomacy and Party Politics. London; New York: Routledge, 1971. 590 p.

Shannon R.T. Gladstone and the Bulgarian Agitation 1876. Hassocks, Eng.: Harvester Press Limited; Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books, 1975. 308 p.

Todorova M.N. Imagining the Balkans. New York: Oxford University Press

Tret’yakova S.N. O.A. Novikova — “neofitsial’nyy posol” Rossii v Anglii [O.A. Novikova, Russia’s “unoffi cial ambassador” to England] // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Series “Istoriya Rossii”. 2010. N 4. P. 103–118.

Whitehead C. The Bulgarian Horrors: Culture and the International History of the Great Eastern Crisis, 1876–1878: PhD Diss. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 2014. 365 p.

Whitehead C. Reading Beside the Lines: Marginalia, W.E. Gladstone, and the International History of the Bulgarian Horrors // Th e International History Review. 2015. Vol. 37. N 4. P. 864–886.

Zashikhin A.N. “Glyadya iz Londona”: Rossiya v obshchestvennoy mysli Britanii: vtoraya polovina XIX — nachalo XX v. [“Looking from London”: Russia in the Public Thought of Britain in the Second Half of the 19th — Early 20th Century]. Arkhangelsk: Izdatel’stvo Pomorskogo mezhdunarodnogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 1994. 204 p.