Abstract

The two major late-Soviet memorial policy projects, “Hero Cities” and “Golden Ring”, had many differences as well as points of intersection in terms of their emergence and development. Each of them appealed to a specific sample of regions, and the struggle for inclusion in the projects was fought at the union, republican, and regional levels. Both were “showcase” destinations for domestic and foreign tourism. E.M. Boltunova and G.S. Yegorova’s monograph “Territory and History: Late Soviet Projects Hero Cities and Golden Ring” makes a significant contribution to the study of two memorial projects of late Soviet society, which provided for it more than new places of memory and tourist routes: they formed alternative foundation myths that competed with the underlying Soviet narrative. The novelty of the monograph is the task of finding points of intersection in the history of seemingly completely unrelated projects: E.M. Boltunova and G.S. Yegorova’s work is about how society and power searched for and created new national meanings and reference points. The cities marked with the title of “Hero Cities” began to be gradually correlated in public historical memory with the territories of the most important battles of the Great Patriotic War, while a number of cities and regions that “fell out” of this project found themselves outside the program of state memorialization of the war 1941–1945. The issue of composition and boundaries also became one of the key aspects of the Golden Ring route development. Representatives of each region tried to justify as convincingly as possible the necessity to pay attention to this or that city or district when implementing the project, as the inclusion of a city in the route would allow the corresponding region to get additional resources for development. The authors of the monograph dwell in detail on the mutual influence of the projects at the level of narratives and visual components, as well as on the self-positioning of the territories included in the projects and their perception.

References

Aksyonova A.I. Suzdal’. XX vek: stranitsy istorii [Suzdal. Th e 20th Century: Pages of History]. Vladimir: Arkaim, 2003. 288 p.

Boltunova E.M., Yegorova G.S. Territoriya i istoriya: posledniye sovetskiye proyekty “Goroda-geroi” i “Zolotoye kol’tso” [Territory and History: Late Soviet Projects of Hero Cities and Golden Ring]. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole, 2022. 400 p.

Davis V. Myth Making in the Soviet Union and Modern Russia: Remembering World War Two in Brezhnev’s Hero City. London: I.B. Taurus, 2018. 368 p.

Mijnssen I. Russia’s Hero Cities: From Postwar Ruins to the Soviet Heroarchy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2021. 332 p.

Pattle Sh. Forging the Golden Ring: Tourist Development and Heritage Preservation in the Late Soviet Union // Th e Slavonic and East European Review. 2018. Vol. 96. N 2. P. 283–309.

Politika pamyati v Rossii — regional’noye izmereniye [Memory Policy in Russia. Regional Dimension] / Ed. by A.I. Miller et al. Moscow: INION RAN, 2023. 471 p.

Popov A.D. “Sozvezdiye vechnoy slavy”: goroda-geroi Sovetskogo Soyuza v geografi cheskom i simvolicheskom prostranstve [“Constellation of Eternal Glory”: Hero Cities of the Soviet Union in Geographical and Symbolic Space] // Novoye proshloye / The New Past. 2019. N. 2. P. 70–87.

Qualls K.D. From Ruins to Reconstruction: Urban Identity in Soviet Sevastopol after World War II. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010. 232 p.

Vakarchuk A.Yu. Turisticheskiy marshrut “Zolotoye kol’tso” i Ivanovskaya oblast’: kak vsyo nachinalos’ (konets 1960-kh — 1970-ye gg.) [Tourist Route “Golden Ring” and Ivanovo Region: How It All Began (Late 1960s — 1970s)] // Trudy Ivanovskogo oblastnogo krayevedcheskogo obshchestva [Proceedings of the Ivanovo Regional Local Lore Society] / Ed. by K.E. Baldin, V.V. Vozilov. Issue 1. Ivanovo: IGIKM im. D.G. Burylina, 2018. P. 128–135.