Abstract
Perception in international relations has long been studied in political science, but historians have not paid suffi cient attention to it so far. Meanwhile, looking at known events through its prism allows us to draw new conclusions about their origins. The prehistory of World War II and its key episode — the failure of attempts to deter Hitler’s aggression in Europe through the joint eff orts of France and the Soviet Union — can serve as a fruitful field for testing this approach. For the military and political elites of France, the USSR was dangerous due to its unpredictability, but an internally fragile. This presumption leveled all the successes of the Soviet leadership in modernizing the country and the armed forces in the eyes of the French. The increased military danger in Europe after 1933 prompted Paris merely to offer Moscow the role of an ordinary participant in the system of collective security, which was based on the experience of World War I and designed as a new model for the development of international relations and minimization of conflicts between countries. The Soviet government viewed France as a leading imperialist power that prioritized anti-Soviet goals, but had a situational interest in limiting German expansion. At the same time, Moscow believed that Soviet-French cooperation could be effective only as an equal strategic alliance aimed at deterring a potential aggressor. This approach was rejected by French diplomacy, which followed the policy of appeasement. It was a source of a deep crisis in bilateral relations at the time of the 1938 Munich agreements. The collapse of appeasement in early 1939 led to a sharp turn by the French government to strategic planning for a possible war and created a window of opportunity for an agreement with the USSR. However, the inertia of old prejudices deprived the tripartite Anglo-French-Soviet negotiations in the spring and summer of 1939 of their practical content and opened the way for a Soviet-German agreement
References
Adamthwaite A. Historians at War // Th e Origins of the Second World War: An International Perspective / Ed. by F. McDonough. London; New York: Continuum, 2011. P. 507–522.
Bach A. Le colonel Mendras et les relations militaires franco-soviétiques: 1932– 1935. Mémoire de maîtrise d’Histoire. Paris: Université de Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, 1981. 230 p.
Belousova Z.S. Frantsiya i yevropeyskaya bezopasnost’, 1929–1939 [France and European Security, 1929–1939]. Moscow: Nauka, 1976. 418 p.
Carley M.J. Stalin’s Gamble. The Search for Allies against Hitler, 1930–1936. Toronto; Buffalo; London: University of Toronto Press, 2023. 640 p.
Catros S. La guerre inéluctable. Les chefs militaires français et la politique étrangère, 1935–1939. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2020. 291 p.
Coeuré S. La grande lueur à l’Est: Les Français et l’Union soviétique. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2017. 359 p.
Degtyarev A.A. Prinyatiye politicheskikh resheniy [Political Decision Making]. Moscow: KDU, 2004. 414 p.
Dessberg F. L’Union Soviétique où l’impossible allié (1922–1941) // Les Européens et la guerre / Sous la dir. de F. Dessberg, C. Malis, I. Davion. Paris: Éditions de la Sorbonne, 2013. P. 79–96.
Dullin S. Stalin i yego diplomaty: Sovetskiy Soyuz i Yevropa, 1930–1939 gg. [Des hommes d’infl uences: Les ambassadeurs de Staline en Europe: 1930–1939]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2009. 319 p.
Duroselle J.-B. L’Abîme (1939–1944). Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1986. 615 p.
Golubev A.V. “Yesli mir obrushitsya na nashu Respubliku”: sovetskoye obshchestvo i vneshnyaya ugroza v 1920–1940-ye gg. [“If the World Tumbles on Our Republic”: Soviet Society and External Th reat in the 1920–1940s]. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole, 2008. 381 p.
Haslam J. The Soviet Union and the Struggle for Collective Security in Europe, 1933–1939. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1984. 312 p.
Haslam J. The Spectre of War. International Communism and the Origins of World War II. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2021. 481 p.
Jackson P. Europe: The Failure of Diplomacy, 1933–1940 // The Cambridge History of the Second World War. Vol. 2. Politics and Ideology / Ed. by R.J.B. Bosworth, J. Maiolo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. P. 216–252.
Janis I.L., Mann L. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: Free Press, 1977. 488 p.
Jepperson R.L., Wendt A., Katzenstein P.J. Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security // The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics / Ed. by P.J. Katzenstein. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996. P. 33–75.
Jervis R. Vospriyatiye i nevernoye vospriyatiye v mezhdunarodnoy politike [Perception and Misperception in International Politics]. Moscow: Tsentr analiza strategiy i tekhnologiy, 2022. 656 p.
Ken O.N., Rupasov A.I. Politbyuro TsK VKP(b) i otnosheniya SSSR s zapadnymi sosednimi gosudarstvami (konets 1920–1930-kh gg.) [Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks and the Relations of the USSR with Western Neighboring States (Late 1920s–1930s)]. Saint Petersburg: Yevropeyskiy dom, 2000. 704 p.
Kochetkov V.V. Kontseptual’nyye podkhody i teoreticheskiye modeli protsessov prinyatiya vneshnepoliticheskikh resheniy: kriticheskiy analiz [Conceptual Approaches and Theoretical Models of Decision-Making Processes in Foreign Policy: A Critical Analysis] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Series 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2008. N 3. P. 100–113.
Luttwak E. Strategiya: logika voyny i mira [Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace]. Moscow: Universitet Dmitriya Pozharskogo, 2012. 391 p.
Magadeyev I.E. Pervaya mirovaya voyna i trendy yevropeyskoy istorii XX veka [World War I and Trends in the 20th-Century European History]. Moscow: Aspektpress, 2021. 253 p.
Martel G. Th e Revisionist as Moralist. A.J.P. Taylor and the Lessons of European History // The Origins of the Second World War Reconsidered: A.J.P. Taylor and the Historians. London; New York: Routledge, 1999. P. 1–12.
Mintz A., DeRouen K., Jr. The Rational Actor Model // Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. P. 57–67.
Réau E. du. Ėdouard Daladier, 1884–1970. Paris: Fayard, 1993. 588 p.
Resis A. Th e Fall of Litvinov: Harbinger of the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact // Europe-Asia Studies. 2000. Vol. 52. No. 1. P. 33–56.
Schroeder P.W. The Transformation of European Politics, 1763–1848. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994. 916 p.
Sipols V.Ya. Diplomaticheskaya bor’ba nakanune Vtoroy mirovoy voyny [Diplomatic Struggle on the Eve of World War II]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 1989. 335 p.
Steiner Z. The Triumph of the Dark. European International History, 1933–1939. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. 1222 p.
Tooze A. Tsena razrusheniya. Sozdaniye i gibel’ natsistskoy ekonomiki [The Wages of Destruction: Th e Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Instituta Gaydara, 2019. 864 p.
Vaiskopf M.Ya. Pisatel’ Stalin [Stalin as Writer]. Moscow: NLO, 2001. 380 p.
Vershinin A.A. V labirinte kollektivnoy bezopasnosti: sovetskaya diplomatiya i proiskhozhdeniye sovetsko-frantsuzskogo pakta o vzaimopomoshchi (1933–1935 gg.) [In the Labyrinth of Collective Security: Soviet Diplomacy and the Origin of the Soviet- French Mutual Aid Pact (1933–1935)] // Rossiyskaya istoriya. 2022. N 5. P. 177–195
Received: 05/16/2023
Accepted date: 06/30/2024
Keywords: perception in international relations; crisis of the Versailles system; World War II; Soviet-French Mutual Aid Pact; Munich agreements; Anglo-French-Soviet negotiations
Available in the on-line version with: 26.06.2024

This work is licensed under a Сreative Commons Atribiution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

