Abstract

The results of Russia’s foreign policy activities on its southern borders enabled the central authorities to intensify the process of modeling the administrative system in the region during the first quarter of the 19th century. The subject of the proposed research is the institute of pristavstvo in the system of administration of the peripheries of the Russian Empire. This institute was established to introduce the peripheral, multi-ethnic and multi-confessional territories of the state into the all-Russian socio-economic and political-legal space. The pristavstvo functioned as a transitional form of imperial administration in the foreign environment. Its initial design was to ensure that the central authorities filled the information vacuum, overcoming the language barrier and creating common rules of interaction in imperial communications. Subsequently, the institution was utilized to communicate the objectives of imperial policy in the region, including the endeavor to overcome the economic isolation of peripheral societies. In this multi-component process, the personality of the imperial offi cial, first and foremost the chief pristav, played an instrumental role. The article utilizes a comprehensive analysis of legislative acts and sources from both central and regional archives to meticulously reconstruct the chronological sequence of events, as well as the changes in individuals who held the post of chief pristav. Initially, the issuance of chief pristavs was conducted through of nominal imperial decrees, and they were attached to the department of the Collegium of Foreign Affairs. Subsequently, however, they came under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. These officials were subordinate to the chief administrator in the Caucasus, and subsequently to the civil governor. Representatives of diff erent class and even ethnic groups were mostly in military service in the North Caucasus. The author concludes that chief pristavs played an intermediary role, dictated not only by the nature of their position, but also by the conditions in which they operated. The objective of their service was to establish a reliable communication conduit that would be consistent with Russia’s policy towards the foreign outskirts, whilst not compromising the prerogatives of the local elite.

References

Abazov A.Kh., Nakhusheva I.R. Pristavskiye upravleniya na Severnom Kavkaze v posledney treti XVIII — pervoy polovine XIX veka: evolyutsiya deyatel’nosti [Pristav

Administrations in the North Caucasus in the Last Th ird of the 18th and First Half of the 20th Century: Activity Evolution] // Nauchnyy dialog. 2020. N 8. P. 278–300.

Bliyeva Z.M. Stanovleniye rossiyskogo byurokraticheskogo apparata na Kavkaze v kontse XVIII — pervoy treti XIX vv. [Formation of the Russian Bureaucratic Apparatus in the Caucasus in the Late 18th and the First Third of the 19th Centuries]. Vladikavkaz: Izdatel’stvo Severo-Osetinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni K.L. Khetagurova, 2001. 284 p.

Cohn B. Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: Th e British in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. 191 p.

Eisenstadt Sh. Struktura otnosheniy tsentra i periferii v imperskikh i imperskofeodal’nykh rezhimakh [The Structure of Relations between the Center and Periphery in Imperial and Imperial-Feudal Regimes] // Sravnitel’noye izucheniye tsivilizatsiy. Khrestomatiya [Comparative Study of Civilizations. An Anthology]. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 1999. P. 176–179.

Goryayev M.S., Komandzhayev A.N. Organizatsiya upravleniya kalmytskim narodom posle uprazdneniya Kalmytskogo khanstva (1771–1825 gg.) [Organization of Administration of the Kalmyk People aft er the Abolition of the Kalmyk Khanate (1771–1825)] // Nauchnyye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Series Istoriya. Politologiya. 2012. N 7 (126). P. 114–124.

Istoriya Kalmykii s drevneyshikh vremen do nashikh dney [History of Kalmykia from Ancient Times to the Present Day]. In 3 vols. Vol. 1. Elista: Gerel, 2009. 848 p.

Izbasarova G.B., Lyubichankovskiy S.V. Pristavstva na okrainakh Rossiyskoy imperii v XVII — pervoy polovine XIX v.: ot administrativnogo litsa k sisteme upravleniya [Pristavstvos on the Outskirts of the Russian Empire from the 17th through the First Half of the 19th Century: From the Administrative Person to the Administrative System] // Rossiyskaya istoriya. 2018. N 2. P. 13–21.

Khodarkovskiy M. Stepnyye rubezhi Rossii: kak sozdavalas’ kolonial’naya imperiya, 1500–1800 [Russia’s Steppe Frontier: Th e Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500– 1800]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, 2019. 352 p.

Kidirniyazov D.S. Pervyye administrativnyye reformy rossiyskikh vlastey na Severnom Kavkaze v kontse XVIII — 20-ye gg. XIX vv. [Th e First Administrative Reforms of the Russian Authorities in the North Caucasus from the Late 18th to the 1820s] // Vestnik Instituta istorii, arkheologii i etnografi i. 2014. N 2 (38). P. 18–32.

Miller A.I. Imperiya Romanovykh i natsionalizm. Esse po metodologii istoricheskogo issledovaniya [The Romanov Empire and Nationalism. Essays on the Methodology of Historical Research]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, 2010. 320 p.

Ocherki istorii Kalmytskoy ASSR. Dooktyabr’skiy period [Essays on the History of the Kalmyk ASSR. Pre-October Period]. Moscow: Nauka, 1967. 479 p.

Sartori P., Shablei P. Eksperimenty imperii: adat, shariat i proizvodstvo znaniy v Kazakhskoy stepi [Empire Experiments: Adat, Sharia and Knowledge Production in the Kazakh Steppe]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, 2019. 280 p.

Svechnikova L.G. Obychay v pravovoy sisteme (na materialakh pravovogo razvitiya narodov Severnogo Kavkaza v XIX v.) [Custom in the Legal System (according to the Materials of Legal Development of the Peoples of the North Caucasus in the 19^th Century)] Stavropol’: AGRUS, 2003. 231 p.