Abstract
The article explores the formation of the concepts of dialogue and pluralism as they relate to the spiritual heritage of Popes John XXIII and Paul VI. The Second Vatican Council (1962–1965) initiated the process of the so-called aggiornamento, i.e. the renewal of various aspects of Catholic teaching, and raised the question of revising the principles of relations between the Roman Catholic Church and modern society. Achieving the objectives of the Council necessitated a shift in the approach and tactics employed in communication, a transformation that could not be realized without acknowledging the indispensability of modern concepts such as pluralism and dialogue. These terms feature prominently in the vocabularies of Popes John XXIII and Paul VI, who, through their encyclicals and messages, have constructed a distinctive semantic framework around these concepts. The Catholic conception of pluralism does not imply plurality and equali ty of the components that make up society, but is divided into legitimate and illegitimate, with the criterion of legitimacy being defi ned by the unquestionable authority of the Holy See. The dialogue, which is predicated on the equality of the parties involved, is, in papal documents, reduced to a refined rhetorical and tactical device to achieve the unchanging goal of restoring the unity of the Christian world under the pope’s authority. This represents a shift in the Roman Catholic Church towards a form of realpolitik in its global relations, while maintaining its missionary objectives. However, this pragmatic approach is also characterized by a certain degree of ambivalence, as it grants the pontiff greater discretion in determining the limits of what is permissible, both in establishing the legitimacy of pluralism and in expanding or narrowing the targets, forms and methods of dialogue. This ambivalence was particularly evident during Pope Francis’s papacy, as evidenced by his openness to non-Christian spiritualities and alternative models of social organization, which elicited a range of reactions from both the general public and the Catholic clergy.
References
Amato G. I cinque inganni della #Pachamama. — URL: https://www.culturacattolica.it/attualit%C3%A0/in-rilievo/ultime-news/2019/11/14/i-cinque-inganni-de...
Anselmo. Monologio e Proslogio / A cura di I. Sciuto. Milano: Bompiani, 2002. 528 p.
Bakhmatova M.N. Konfessional’nyye faktory sotsiokul’turnykh transformatsiy ital’yanskogo obshchestva v 70-ye gg. XX v. [Confessional Factors of Socio-Cultural Transformations of Italian Society in the 1970s] // Zhit’ v epokhu peremen. Sud’ba uchenogo i trayektorii nauki. K stoletiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professora Gennadiya Yevgen’yevicha Markova [Living in the Era of Change. Fate of a Scientist and Trajectories of Science. On the Centenary of the Birth of Professor Gennady Evgen’yevich Markov] / Ed. by M.N. Bakhmatova, O.E. Kaz’mina, T.D. Solovey Saint Petersburg: Aleteia. 2023. P. 128–142 / Proceedings of the Faculty of History at Moscow State University. Issue 239. Series II. Istoricheskiye issledovaniya [Historical Researches], 165.
Bakhmatova M. Tra Mosca e Verona. Un dialogo controcorrente. Trento: Il Margine, 2016. 280 p.
Boato M. Chi era Giovanni XXIII, il Papa Buono che fece la rivoluzione // L’Unità. 3 giugno 2023. — URL: https://www.unita.it/2023/06/03/chi-era-giovannixxiii-il-papa-buono-che-fece-la-rivoluzione/Il “Corriere d’informazione” pubblica una vignetta sulla “Falcem in terris”, riferita alla falce che compariva nel simbolo del Partito comunista. — URL: https://www.bergamonews.it/2013/04/14/la-pacem-in-terrislenciclica-di-roncallie-lequivoco-politico/1...
Istoriya II Vatikanskogo perioda [History of Vatican II]. Vol. V. Sobor — povorotnyy moment v istorii Tserkvi [The Council as a Turning Point in the History of the Church] / Ed. by. J. Alberigo, A. Bodrov, A. Zubov. Moscow: Bibleysko-bogoslovskiy institut sv. apostola Andreya, 2009. P. 81–228.
Kaz’mina O.E. Missionerstvo i prozelitizm kak kategoriya religioznogo diskursa i akademicheskogo analiza [Missionaryism and Proselytism as a Category of Religious Discourse and Academic Analysis] // Vestnik antropologii. 2015. N 2 (30). P. 48–65.
Marchetto A. II Vatikanskiy sobor. Kontrapunkt k istorii [Vatican II. Counterpoint to History]. Moscow: Dukhovnaya biblioteka, 2009. 160 p.
Pinotti F. Fratelli d’Italia. Segrate: Rizzoli, 2007. 751 p.
Riccardi А. Il Cattolicesimo della Repubblica // Storia d’Italia / A cura di G. Sabbatucci, V. Vidotto. Vol. VI. Novara: Editori Laterza, 1999. 796 p.
Sabsay S. 11 oktyabrya. Den’ pamyati svyatogo Ioanna XXIII i godovshchina otkrytiya II Vatikanskogo sobora [11 October. Th e Day of Commemoration of St John XXIII and the Anniversary of the Opening of the Second Vatican Council] // Sibirskaya katolicheskaya gazeta. Izdaniye rimsko-katolicheskoy preobrazhenskoy yeparkhii v Novosibirske. — URL: https://sib-catholic.ru/den-pamyati-svyatogo-ioanna-xxiii-igodovshhina-otkryitiya-ii-vatikanskogo-so...
Villa L. Paolo VI beato? Brescia: Operaie di Maria Immacolata Editrice Civiltà, 1998. 358 p. — URL: https://www.effedieffe.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2653&Itemid=100021
Received: 05/15/2024
Accepted date: 06/30/2025
Keywords: Roman Catholic Church, pluralism, dialogue, people of goodwill, Second Vatican Council, aggiornamento, soft power politics
Available in the on-line version with: 30.06.2025

This work is licensed under a Сreative Commons Atribiution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

